same-sex marriage, Uncategorized

GAY MARRIAGE – THE TIME HAS COME

168 Comments

wedding float 2

In the last few weeks, several courts have moved toward recognition of gays’ right to marry.  The ultra-conservatives of the Republican Party have gone ballistic.  Mike Huckabee has threatened to take his ball and go home.  Like it or not, this is progress.

THE REASONS FOR RECOGNIZING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ARE SIMPLE.

First, it’s about equality.  Rather than being a psychological abnormality, as was believed in the fifties, homosexuality is a natural condition.  The notion that there is ‘something wrong’ with anyone who prefers the same sex was debunked, a long time ago.  An excellent narrative on the history of psychological thoughts on homosexuality is found here.[i]

The majority of humans are heterosexual.  The majority of humans are also right-handed.  Being in the minority doesn’t make one inferior.  Discriminating against someone for being in the minority is innately unfair.  Left-handed people have the same rights as those who are right-handed.  Homosexuals have the same rights as heterosexuals.

That’s the moral reason.  The legal reason is the application of the equal-protection and due-process clauses of the Constitution.  Granting a marriage license is a government function.  Recognizing the existence of a marriage for tax and estate purposes is a government function.  Everyone is supposed to equal treatment by the government (including state governments under the 14th Amendment) in its performance of its functions.

In case you haven’t noticed, there is a clear pattern to the decisions recently rendered by the federal courts on this question.  They are overwhelmingly recognizing that discrimination against gays by government entities violates the Constitution.

THE REASONS GIVEN AGAINST RECOGNIZING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ARE NOT VALID.

The right wing, especially those who call themselves Christians, keep making the same, tired arguments.  What is amusing is how often these arguments are quite similar to arguments used earlier, for everything from maintaining slavery to forbidding interracial marriage.

So let’s take a look at the more popular excuses for blocking gay marriage.

Same-sex marriage will destroy the sanctity of marriage.

This argument is often accompanied by the appropriate verse from Leviticus, declaring homosexuality to be an abomination.  Of course, those who quote this verse tend to ignore many of the other things the Old Testament says.  A humorous take on this, called “Why Can’t I Own a Canadian?”[ii] makes this point quite well.  Christians who condemn homosexuality tend to forget one other thing.  There is no record of Jesus ever having said one word about it.

In Matthew 19, Jesus did say a little about divorce and remarriage.  That would seem to be a more direct statement on ‘the sanctity of marriage’ than the cherry-picked verse from Leviticus.  Yet no one seems (these days, at least) to want to try to make divorce illegal.

But all of that is beside the point.  Churches may regard marriage as sacred, or some such thing.  And I have no problem with any religious organization telling its members what is right or wrong for them.  Where I have a problem is a church telling everyone else, particularly those who don’t share their beliefs, what they can and cannot do.

Marriage is a legal status.  You do not have the right to use your religion, to determine another’s legal status.  To do so would be a violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment.

I addressed this indirectly one of my books.  In the first chapter of Differential, I had the main character debating a preacher.  The argument about the sanctity of marriage seems familiar, until the reader learns that the subject is interracial marriage.  That was a real issue in the sixties, where this scene occurs.  The argument was made then, too.  It is as unpersuasive now as it was then.

 If we allow gays to marry, it will lead to pedophile marriages, and people marrying dogs.

Really?  Show me the evidence that these things have become more frequent in Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, France, the United Kingdom , Sweden, or Luxembourg.  This argument is basically saying that homosexuality is a perversion, and legalizing same-sex marriage will somehow set a precedent for legalizing other perversions.  Any change to the law should be weighed on its own merits, not on what someone thinks may be the next point of contention.  Where do we draw the line?  For me, that’s easy: consenting adults.

We should encourage procreation.

Procreation happens by instinct.  Letting those who don’t share that instinct marry will not change it, for those who do.  Besides that, overpopulation is a serious problem.  The encouragement to ‘be fruitful and multiply’ was seven billion people ago.  We can let up any time now.

The majority of the voters and/or the individual states should have the right to decide this issue.

That’s why we have the Bill of Rights.  It protects the minority from the excesses of the majority.  As far as the states’rights argument is concerned, see the discussion of the 14th Amendment, above.  Had we left it to the individual states, slavery might still be legal in some of them.  And we almost certainly wouldn’t have integrated schools in all of them.

CONCLUSION.

As with most social issues in this country, same-sex marriage has taken some time to reach maturity.  In my mind, two things led to this point.  1) The recognition by the psychological community, discussed above, that homosexuality is not a psychological abnormality, and 2) The recognition by the court system that homosexuality is not a crime.[iii]

Once we realized that gays are not sick and are not criminals, it led inexorably to the conclusion that they are normal human beings.  As such, they have the same rights as heterosexuals.

[i] http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html

[ii] http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/areasontosmile/2011/11/dear-dr-laura-why-cant-i-own-a-canadian.html#

[iii] Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)

168 thoughts on “GAY MARRIAGE – THE TIME HAS COME”

  4. Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all of us you really know what you’re talking about! Bookmarked. Please also visit my website =). We could have a link exchange contract between us!

  5. Sorry, I don’t know much about the technical stuff. I will ask a friend who knows more and let you know.

  11. Hello my friend! I wish to say that this article is amazing, great written and include approximately
    all significant infos. I’d like to peer extra posts like
    this .

  12. Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just
    your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and everything.
    Nevertheless think of if you added some great photos or video clips to
    give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is
    excellent but with images and video clips, this sute
    could certainly be one of the greatest in its field.
    Amazing blog!

    Stop by my homepage: best dating sites

  37. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the long run and it’s time to be
    happy. I have read this submit and if I may just I desire to recommend you some
    fascinating issues or advice. Perhaps you could write subsequent articles referring to this article.
    I wish to read even more things about it!

  46. Thank you for such a terrific blog. Where else could anyone get that type of info written in such a perfect way?
    I have a presentation that I am presently writing on, and I
    have been on the look out for such excellent information.
    Happy to find your blog.

    Here is my site; lock services

  62. Hello! I know this is somewhat off-topic but I needed to ask.
    Does running a well-established website like yours take a
    massive amount work? I am brand new to running a blog
    but I do write in my journal everyday. I’d like
    to start a blog so I can share my personal experience and thoughts online.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestions
    or tips for new aspiring bloggers. Thankyou!

  104. Wonderful blog! Do you have any tips for aspiring writers? I’m hoping to start my own website soon but I’m a little
    lost on everything. Would you suggest starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are
    so many options out there that I’m totally confused ..

    Any recommendations? Cheers!

    my site; How To Get my Ex Back

  108. This is my first time to visit here. I discovered many entertaining stuff as part of your
    blog, specifically its discussion. From the plenty of comments on the posts, I guess I’m not the only one having most of the enjoyment!
    Keep up the favorable job.

  168. Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin

Leave a Reply